whatsapp x

WhatsApp Number

8750970582

Message
phone x
8750970582
email x
info@lawminds.co.in

Foreign law firms’ entry in India: Delhi HC seeks BCI’s response in plea challenging move

In New Delhi, the Delhi High Court has issued a notice in response to a plea challenging a notification released by the Bar Council of India (BCI) last year, which allowed the entry of foreign law firms and lawyers into India. The court, presided over by Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, has summoned responses from both the BCI and the central government.

The court has set April 24 as the date for the hearing, seeking the BCI’s perspective on the plea. The case revolves around the Rules for Registration and Regulation of Foreign Lawyers and Foreign Law Firms in India, 2022, introduced by the BCI last year. These rules permit the registration and practice of non-litigious law matters in India by foreign lawyers.

The plea questions the BCI’s authority under the Advocates Act of 1961 to grant such permissions, contending that, according to the current law, only advocates enrolled with the BCI are authorized to practice law in India.

Initially, the Bar Council of India opposed the entry of foreign lawyers and law firms in any form. However, in Joint Consultative Conferences between 2007-14, it was collectively decided by the BCI, State Bar Councils, and other stakeholders to explore this avenue. In September 2022, discussions between representatives from the Law Society of England and Wales, the U.K. government’s international trade department, and Indian law firm representatives took place, advocating for the removal of restrictions on foreign lawyers practicing in India.

In response, the BCI issued rules in March 2023, permitting foreign lawyers and law firms to practice foreign law, international law, and international arbitration matters in India, strictly under the principle of reciprocity. Notably, they are not allowed to appear in Indian courts. However, the plea raises concerns about the absence of a mutual arrangement between India and the countries whose law firms are permitted to operate in India, arguing that the BCI’s decision violates the principle of reciprocity. The plea emphasizes that opening up law practice in India to foreign lawyers will contribute to the growth of the legal profession in the country.

Cruelty to animals: New Bill proposes increase in fine from Rs. 50to Rs. 1 lakh

NEW DELHI: Trinamool Congress (TMC) MP Saket Gokhale recently announced on his social media platform ‘X’ (formerly Twitter) that he has introduced a Bill in Parliament to amend the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. The proposed amendment aims to substantially increase the fine for acts of cruelty towards animals from Rs. 50 to Rs. 1,00,000.

The existing Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 defines ‘cruelty’ as ‘any unnecessary pain and suffering’ to animals. Despite significant changes in the man-animal relationship over the past few decades globally and in India, this nearly 65-year-old law, which is the primary legislation addressing animal welfare, remains unaltered.

Section 11 of the Act outlines various acts and omissions that constitute ‘unnecessary pain or suffering,’ including overloading, over-riding, starving, abandoning, and beating an animal. The Act holds owners accountable for prosecution if any Section 11 provisions are violated, imposing fines ranging from ten rupees to fifty rupees for a first offense and up to one hundred rupees or imprisonment for a term of up to three months, or both, for subsequent offenses within three years.

While the fines were substantial when the law was introduced 64 years ago, they have become outdated in today’s context, prompting calls from various organizations for an increase in penalties for cruelty against animals.

Gokhale’s Bill responds to these widespread demands for changes in the law. The global shift in recent years towards greater awareness of animal welfare rights has prompted legislative bodies worldwide to enact or amend laws to better protect animals. The proposed increase in fines under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, reflects a growing acknowledgment of the need to safeguard the rights and dignity of animals.

The original Act was a landmark legislation in India, covering the protection of animals and regulations regarding their treatment, transportation, and use in various activities. However, due to the lack of an update in the fine amounts, the law has been deemed ineffective.

By proposing higher penalties, lawmakers like Gokhale aim to discourage inhumane practices and foster a culture of compassion and respect towards animals. Additionally, the increased fines seek to align Indian legislation with international standards of animal welfare, showcasing India’s commitment to upholding universal principles and contributing to global efforts to enhance the well-being of animals.