whatsapp x

WhatsApp Number

8750970582

Message
phone x
8750970582
email x
info@lawminds.co.in

Gadag Murder Case: BJP Leader’s Son Gave ₹65 Lakh Supari To Bump Off Parents & Step-Brother Over Property Dispute; Contract Killers Murder Guests Including 17-Year-Old Girl

The police held a press conference on Tuesday, April 23rd, where they revealed that they had arrested eight people in connection with a disturbing murder case. Among those arrested was the son of a local leader from the BJP party, Prakash Bakale. This son, named Vinayak Bakale, was from Prakash Bakale’s first marriage. Shockingly, Vinayak Bakale had allegedly paid someone to kill his own father, step-brother, and step-mother due to a dispute over property.

The incident took place in Gadag, Karnataka, where four people, including the son of a BJP leader, were killed by hired killers on February 19th, around 2:30 am. However, it was revealed that the intended targets were not the ones who lost their lives. Instead, the killers mistakenly attacked the son of the BJP leader and three other individuals who were visiting the house at the time. Among those killed was a 17-year-old girl.

According to the police, Vinayak Bakale had offered a sum of money to a person named Fairoz Khazi to carry out the murders. He had already paid Khazi Rs. 65 lakhs and an additional Rs. 2 lakhs in advance. The plan was to eliminate his family members, but it went horribly wrong, resulting in the deaths of innocent guests.

The Inspector General of Police for North Karnataka, Vikas Kumar, stated that eight individuals had been apprehended in connection with the murders. An investigation into the case was ongoing, with the police working diligently to uncover the truth behind the heinous crime. Vinayak Bakale was identified as the mastermind behind the plot, driven by a property dispute and resentment towards his family members.

The contract killers mistakenly targeted three members of the Hadimani family who were visiting the Bakales, believing them to be Prakash Bakale, his wife, and his son Kartik Bakale. They brutally murdered the guests, and when Kartik Bakale, who was sleeping downstairs, heard the commotion and rushed to investigate, he too fell victim to the attackers.

The police swiftly launched an investigation into the incident, forming specialized teams to crack the case. Within four days, they had made significant progress and managed to apprehend the perpetrators. It was revealed that Vinayak Bakale’s motive for the murders stemmed from his frustration at being prevented from selling a property that belonged to his step-brother, Kartik Bakale. This led him to orchestrate the sinister plan to have his family members killed.

In summary, what initially appeared to be a straightforward murder case took a shocking turn when it was revealed that the mastermind behind the killings was none other than the son of a prominent political figure. The tragic consequences of Vinayak Bakale’s actions not only resulted in the loss of innocent lives but also exposed the dark underbelly of family disputes and greed. However, thanks to the swift action of the police, justice was served, and those responsible were brought to account for their crimes.

Uber bans Hindu woman ‘Swastika’ Chandra, calls her name ‘offensive’, later apologises

Uber, the American ride-hailing behemoth, garnered attention recently for its ban on a 35-year-old woman named Swastika Chandra from Sydney, Australia, citing her first name as “potentially offensive” due to its unfortunate associations with Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Party.

However, Chandra was quick to clarify that her name holds significance rooted in Sanskrit, where it symbolizes ‘good luck’, a meaning widely recognized in her native Fiji, where she spent her formative years. Unraveling the saga, news.com.au reported that Chandra stumbled upon the ban when attempting to place an order via Uber Eats, only to be met with a disconcerting message urging her to alter her name on the app.

In an interview with A Current Affair, an Australian TV program, Chandra voiced her steadfast refusal to succumb to the pressures of altering her name, asserting her pride in its cultural heritage and highlighting its seamless integration into all her official Australian documents without incident.

“They don’t know that the Hindus used it for thousands of years before Hitler used it in the wrong way,” she asserted, encapsulating the depth of historical and cultural significance embedded within her name.

The ban persisted for a staggering five months until the intervention of prominent entities such as the Hindu Council and the New South Wales attorney-general, which catalyzed the reinstatement of Chandra’s Uber account, as reported by ACA. Notably, the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies also rallied behind Chandra, signaling a broader coalition of support transcending cultural and religious boundaries.

In a bid to ameliorate the fallout from the controversy, Uber issued an apology to Chandra, acknowledging the protracted duration of their review process. The company elucidated its global policy aimed at curbing access for users whose names contain potentially offensive connotations, underscoring its commitment to fostering a safe and inclusive environment for all patrons.

“Uber is committed to facilitating a safe and welcoming environment for all users. For that reason, Uber has a global policy of restricting access to users whose names entered into the Uber app contain potentially offensive words,” the statement affirmed.

Recognizing the nuanced complexities inherent in cultural naming conventions, Uber reiterated its commitment to adjudicating such incidents on a case-by-case basis, ensuring equitable treatment for all users. In the case of Ms. Chandra, the company conceded an oversight in judgment and promptly reinstated her access to the app, accompanied by a sincere apology for any inconvenience caused.

“We have apologised to Ms Chandra for the inconvenience this caused her, and we appreciate her patience as we reviewed the matter, which took longer than we hoped it would,” Uber affirmed, concluding its response with a commitment to upholding principles of inclusivity and sensitivity in its operational ethos.